Archive for the ‘Philosophy’ Category

Is the dictionary the best source?

Posted January 23, 2010 by Charles
0

When an author is trying to convince you that something means what you know it doesn’t, they’ll often go to the dictionary for support.

How can a virtual church be [a local church]? Glad you asked. If you look up the word local in the dictionary, it means “belonging to or existing in a particular place,” or more specifically, “of or belonging to the neighborhood.” [...]

Local churches are local not because of geography but because they are one specific group belonging to a place of seeking after God together.

From SimChurch

By this point the author has already redefined place in a way that includes “virtual spaces”, like a neighborhood in Second Life, so by saying that local is about place, he can reasonably conclude that a congregation that exists only in cyberspace is a true “local church”.

But is the dictionary definition really the best way to go about this? It seems problematic to me, and I expect others are uncomfortable with it as well. Read more

The Pace of Change or “I hate being wrong”

Posted December 31, 2009 by Charles
1

Over the last few months I’ve heard and read time and again that “things are changing more rapidly than they ever have before.” I wasn’t buying. In my mind there were just too many things that are the same as they were 50 and 100 years ago.

We still use phones (though not tied to the wall or party lines), watch TV and listen to radio (though with higher fidelity and more options), and travel in vehicles powered by fossil fuels.

The one major change that I’ve acknowledged over and over (since the telephone and telegraph) is the computer processor. It’s the common thread in most of the advances I can pinpoint over the last 50 years: advances in space travel, science, engineering, communications, the internet. But I wouldn’t admit that any other change was more than cosmetic, or a shifting of emphases.

Then I asked John Dyer an open-ended question: “What do you think about the idea that things are changing faster than ever before?”

“I think it’s statistically verifiable.” Then he proceeded to walk me through just how wrong I was.

Read more

Is postmodernism developed enough to be defined?

Posted October 20, 2009 by Charles
2

We’ve been talking about postmodernism in one of my classes, and it’s sparked quite a bit of thought lately. I may  (or may not, who knows) be focusing on it this week.

Jacques Derrida, aka Ralph Lauren's sexier older brother - Early don of postmodern thought

Jacques Derrida, aka Ralph Lauren's sexier older brother - Early don of postmodern thought

“Postmodern” is becoming the “Attica” of an entire generation. Rather than a statement about excessive police force, it is the cry of a generation that feels it has been oppressed by the assumptions and worldview of its forebears. The language of postmodernism is ubiquitous, but it’s incredibly difficult to explain what, exactly, it is.

One of the major problems is the “Observer Effect” or “Hawthorne Effect”: The act of observing and event or phenomenon changes it. Contemporary Western society has a strong awareness of its intellectual traditions stemming from relatively Eastern roots in Greece. We understand the differences in epistemology and metaphysics that separate classical, medieval, Renaissance, Enlightenment, liberal, and postliberal thinking. We have dissected and explained where and when they started, how they developed, and, more or less, pinpointed where we stand today. As a result of all that study, we are painfully aware of the shift that is occurring, and we are paying it its due attention.

But as observers of the phenomenon of postmodernism, we are changing it’s nature. The philosophical debates of the past seemed to focus on which concepts were right and better; the questions were asked and answered with the purpose of improving human thought and communication. But the conversations on postmodernism seem to be mainly focused on defining “postmodernism”. They are conversations in which you’ll hear the phrase, “That’s not postmodern thinking!” It seems that many people think that postmodernism is something already fully developed (of course it is, it has a name, doesn’t it?), and if they can name it, they can automatically jump to the better life that it promises.

Read more

Monopolies

Posted July 17, 2009 by Charles
0

“You think you have a monopoly on the truth.

I have  run across this phrase, and others like it, far too many times. I’d like to encourage you never to use it again. It’s the worst kind of cop out, and an inherently hypocritical statement.

Copping Out

When a person is arguing his point, but his opponent won’t relent, he’ll start arguing for the  fifth. What I mean is that he’ll say things about his opponent and opposing position that will force either an incriminating response or an invocation of the Fifth Amendment. The goal of that statement is to, first of all, put an opponent in her place, as well as point out some level of arrogance on her behalf; it has the added bonus of getting oohs from progressive audiences, most of whom are, like 13-year-old girls, thinking, “OOOOHHHH, burn!”

Read more

Wife Swap and the Liberal Mind

Posted February 14, 2008 by Charles
5

wife_swap_with_border.jpgMy son is sick, so my wife stayed home tonight while I went to praise team practice at the church. While I was gone she watched Wife Swap. Tonight’s episode swapped a very conservative Christian family with a very liberal Christian family. In my trade mark fashion I will refer to them as “Connie” and “Libby”…you figure out which is which.

Connie is a stay-at-home mom, six kids (if I counted right). Libby works and her husband is a stay-at-home dad, 2 girls. I’m going to watch the episode as soon as I can find it somewhere online, but this is one situation related to me by my wife:

Connie’s children don’t date. Her philosophy is that young teens aren’t ready to make a serious (read: “lifelong”) commitment, so there’s no reason to date. Libby has no such rule.

When Connie sits down with Libby’s girls to discuss dating, she says, “This is what I believe about dating…What do you think?” When given the opportunity to think about it, one of the girls says that it makes a lot of sense. Over at Connie’s house, Libby has told her oldest girls that they have to go speed dating. They refused. Read more

  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
  • >

Power of Suggestion is proudly powered by WordPress.org and whiteboard

© Charles Jones 2006-2009 // pos51.org