Finally a post that isn’t in the Politics category:
But liberal religion has a dogma and it views the contemporary world through the eyes of this dogma. The dogma is all the more potent in coloring opinion because it is not known as a dogma. The dogma is that the world is gradually growing better and that the inevitability of gradualness guarantees our salvation.
I’d say that the same applies to the dogma of “tolerance”. The ironies of this dogma are that (a) its advocacy typically involves a caustic intolerance for conservative ideas; and (b) it ignores the fact that tolerance requires some disagreement. It’s not really tolerance if I agree with you. It’s only tolerance if I disagree with you, but tolerate you (not necessarily your ideas). I hear a great deal about this “tolerance” from friends who identify with Emergent strains (yes, “strains” - like a virus) of the emerging church.
But this idea of tolerance falls right in with the mistaken notion of progress. It moves contrary to the gospel, and the command to contend earnestly for the faith.
Technorati Tags: emergent, emerging_church, gospel, liberal_christianity, niebuhr, progress, tolerance, virus





























