13 notes &
Lawyered.
And economisted.
13 notes &
Lawyered.
And economisted.
0 notes &
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke last week warned that a default could have “catastrophic” effects on financial markets.
Plosser, a former dean of the Simon School of Business at Rochester University, was more circumspect.
“It could be very bad. At some level we don’t really know what the consequences could be. It could be very serious. It could be less serious. Do we really want to run that experiment?”
HuffPo - “Federal Reserve Actively Preparing For The Possibility Of U.S. Default”
Yes, I think we do.
(Source: The Huffington Post)
Notes &
Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. OMG WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT? Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. I should sleep now. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. SHIT THAT IS SO FUCKING COOL. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. HOW DID HE DO THAT?!?! Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. I think I have carpel tunnel. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble. Should probably sleep. Stumble. Stumble. Oh my fucking god, is this real?! Stumble. Stumble. Stumble.
And then you die.
And then you Stumble from heaven. Stumble. Stumble. Stumble.
Stumble.
13 notes &
I didn’t make it halfway through the second paragraph before I was “oh my godding” incessantly.
You have been warned. This is bad.
He did sort of blame the Fed at the end…
5 notes &
(Source: coeus)
6 notes &
I have introduced the full ‘start-over’ ERA in each Congress since I arrived because the rights of women deserve to be constitutional.
Rep. Carolyn Malony, quoted in Barbara Hannah Grufferman: Will America Kill the Equal Rights Amendment?
No, actually, they don’t. The Constitution is about the rights of Americans. No specific group deserves to be included in it. The rights of women are constitutional, because they’re the same rights, with the same protections, offered to every one of us.
Besides, passing would be like affirmative action; you declare that fully half the American population essentially has a birth defect, and it can only be rectified through constitutional protection.
4 notes &
Among the most deliberate and abhorrent mass violations of privacy committed in recent memory did not come as a result of technology, social services, databases, hackers, thieves, leakers, or governments. It was an act of a news organization, News Corp., which hacked into the phones of a reported 4,000 people, including not just celebrities but dead children and the families of the victims of terrorism and war.
Power corrupts.
The oh-so-rich irony is that this comes from the same company that, through its Wall Street Journal, fancies itself the protector of our privacy. The Journal would have us believe that web sites, technology companies, advertisers, and retailers are the enemies of privacy. No, it was their own corporate colleagues, their fellow journalists.
The solution to this threat to privacy is not to change technology or even the law. It is to enforce the laws, norms, and mores that already exist and hold to account the criminals and those responsible for their actions. That is, the managers of News Corp. That is, the Murdoch family.
This is not a matter of technology but of corruption.
Jeff Jarvis: A Real Threat to Privacy
I’m amazed that this guy is able to support himself by writing. Grammatically, stylistically, and logically, this article is a giant fail whale.
“Power Corrupts”,”oh-so-rich irony”—back to back? Then, in the course of five sentences, he says both that the “managers of News Corp” and the Murdoch family are responsible, and that only a “small number of the [News of the World]’s employees was responsible”. Which is it?
This article is priceless entertainment, especially when combined with the derangement of its partner-in-crazy: “American Sins: Less Sensational, But More Dangerous”.
Please enjoy…
11 notes &
This comma makes me smile. I love this comma.
(Source: cdcreative.co.uk)
1 note &
…when you describe yourself as “edgy”. Using the term to refer to yourself or your own work doesn’t make you edgy. It makes you a douchebag.
That is all.
96 notes &
Human beings are unique. You are not mere animals. People are special.
True…
We tend to (correctly) identify
- “intellect”
- “ethics”
- “planning”
- “second-order desires”
- “complex written language”
- “art”
- “theory of mind”
and other characteristics as categorically distinguishing …