The Incomplete Cynic

I'm usually a pessimist, but sometimes I just can't not believe.

text

The AZ law isn’t “bad”, just vague

The Arizona legislature needs to clear up and codify definitions of “lawful contact” and “reasonable suspicion”. It’s far more important for the former to have a clear definition, and they need to do it quickly to shut up the people swearing that cops will just walk up to Hispanic people (presumably walking their dog or taking their kids for ice cream) and ask for their “papers” (please say ID…no one actually has “papers”).

Absent some clearly defined “lawful contact”, asking for ID would probably constitute an unreasonable search, and would be un-Constitutional. Also, don’t forget the law prohibits an investigation into someone’s immigration status “if the determination may hinder or obstruct an investigation”…so if it would cause someone to think twice about reporting a crime or providing evidence, they can’t check.

See the text here: http://www.keytlaw.com/blog/2010/04/anti-illegal-immigration-law-part-1/

link

a momentary stay against insanity: a bit of an unfinished beginning

What if God Himself is leading us on in the search for that magical spark of something indefinably beautiful? Maybe God puts those little sparks inside us when He forms us, little sparks of home that won’t let us give up…

This is a great description of a spiritual reality. Our search for fulfillment is a gift from God that begins with God. But the conclusion to draw isn’t that God is trying to lead us to something else, but that he is the “something indefinably beautiful”, and he is leading us to himself.

Ecclesiastes says that God put eternity in our hearts, meaning that, while we are temporal, there is something in the deep parts of us that cannot be satisfied by anything that is not eternal. And there is nothing eternal but God.

quote

Something unique happened in Obama’s first year,” Daniel Henninger wrote. “The veil was ripped from the true cost of government. This is a ghastly nightmare the Democrats have needed to keep locked in a crypt.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/Media-still-clueless-about-Tea-Parties-92211359.html#ixzz0mPvDAlar

photos

An awesome purple Karmann Ghia I saw at QT last weekend.

text

A New Theological Term

I think that, in order to match up our “-ification” terms (just-,sanct-, glor-) we should stop saying “condemnation” and instead say “hellification”. Just a thought.

quote

In the economic sphere an act, a habit, an institution, a law produces not only one effect, but a series of effects. Of these effects, the first alone is immediate; it appears simultaneously with its cause; it is seen. The other effects emerge only subsequently; they are not seen; we are fortunate if we foresee them.

There is only one difference between a bad economist and a good one: the bad economist confines himself to the visible effect; the good economist takes into account both the effect that can be seen and those effects that must be foreseen.

Yet this difference is tremendous; for it almost always happens that when the immediate consequence is favorable, the later consequences are disastrous, and vice versa. Whence it follows that the bad economist pursues a small present good that will be followed by a great evil to come, while the good economist pursues a great good to come, at the risk of a small present evil.

Frederic Bastiat, “What is Seen and What is Not Seen”

link

whakahekeheke: re: What's wrong with Statism?

There is one fundamental characteristic that distinguishes the government – the nation-state – from all other human organizations. That characteristic is the legitimized threat of death.

photo

Yesterday we went grocery shopping at Whole Foods. On Saturdays the place is full of samples and musicians and all kinds of entertaining stuff. It’s a fun place to be. 
Toward the back of the store we saw a group of people giving samples of drinkable yogurt (which my little guy loves). They were all wearing these “Who’s Your Farmer?” shirts, except for one, whose shirt said “I’m Your Farmer.” We liked the yogurt and decided to buy some.
About a half-hour later we were checking out and they walked up. 
“Hi, we noticed you have some Organic Valley products in your cart, and we’d like to buy your groceries.” Um, yes, I think that’d be all right. 
We were very excited, but you want to know how sinful our hearts are? Within five minutes we’d both thought of a list of things that we wish we hadn’t put back or that we’d remembered to get, so that they’d be free. We’ll add that to the list of things to work on.

Yesterday we went grocery shopping at Whole Foods. On Saturdays the place is full of samples and musicians and all kinds of entertaining stuff. It’s a fun place to be. 

Toward the back of the store we saw a group of people giving samples of drinkable yogurt (which my little guy loves). They were all wearing these “Who’s Your Farmer?” shirts, except for one, whose shirt said “I’m Your Farmer.” We liked the yogurt and decided to buy some.

About a half-hour later we were checking out and they walked up. 

“Hi, we noticed you have some Organic Valley products in your cart, and we’d like to buy your groceries.” Um, yes, I think that’d be all right. 

We were very excited, but you want to know how sinful our hearts are? Within five minutes we’d both thought of a list of things that we wish we hadn’t put back or that we’d remembered to get, so that they’d be free. We’ll add that to the list of things to work on.

photos

My kiddos…

text

“New Deal or Raw Deal?

[FDR’s] key advisers were frantic at the possibility of the Great Depression’s return when [World War II] ended and the soldiers came home. The president believed a New Deal revival was the answer—and on Oct. 28, 1944, about six months before his death, he spelled out his vision for a postwar America. It included government-subsidized housing, federal involvement in health care, more TVA projects, and the “right to a useful and remunerative job” provided by the federal government if necessary.

Roosevelt died before the war ended and before he could implement his New Deal revival. His successor, Harry Truman, in a 16,000 word message on Sept. 6, 1945, urged Congress to enact FDR’s ideas as the best way to achieve full employment after the war.

Congress—both chambers with Democratic majorities—responded by just saying “no.” No to the whole New Deal revival: no federal program for health care, no full-employment act, only limited federal housing, and no increase in minimum wage or Social Security benefits.

Instead, Congress reduced taxes. Income tax rates were cut across the board. FDR’s top marginal rate, 94% on all income over $200,000, was cut to 86.45%. The lowest rate was cut to 19% from 23%, and with a change in the amount of income exempt from taxation an estimated 12 million Americans were eliminated from the tax rolls entirely.

Corporate tax rates were trimmed and FDR’s “excess profits” tax was repealed, which meant that top marginal corporate tax rates effectively went to 38% from 90% after 1945.

Georgia Sen. Walter George, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, defended the Revenue Act of 1945 with arguments that today we would call “supply-side economics.” If the tax bill “has the effect which it is hoped it will have,” George said, “it will so stimulate the expansion of business as to bring in a greater total revenue.”

He was prophetic. By the late 1940s, a revived economy was generating more annual federal revenue than the U.S. had received during the war years, when tax rates were higher. Price controls from the war were also eliminated by the end of 1946. The U.S. began running budget surpluses.

Congress substituted the tonic of freedom for FDR’s New Deal revival and the American economy recovered well. Unemployment, which had been in double digits throughout the 1930s, was only 3.9% in 1946 and, except for a couple of short recessions, remained in that range for the next decade.

Burt Folsom in the Wall Street Journal

Following