Posts Tagged ‘bad_theology’

Is Emergent All Sizzle and Speculation?

Posted December 18, 2008 by Charles
4

sizzle-feature

[There are a lot of people who think I'm uncharitable to the Emergent Movement in many ways.  I don't mind the sentiment, and I'm happy to debate it with you.]

The outspoken members of the Emergent movement – those who are interested in and effective at getting the word around – talk endlessly about the monolithic “emerging generation” and it’s concerns. They talk about what youth and young adults will and won’t be attracted to, or interested in. They talk about what the church will have to do to survive, because if it continues as it is, it will be pushed to the fringes as modernism crumbles. They have centered their positions, their existence, around one thing: they know where culture is going. They know the future.

They won’t tell you this. They’ll point to surveys, books, social and religious trends, and most often they’ll turn to anecdotes. They’ll look at what is starting to happen in small pockets around the country, and tell you that this is what is going to happen. They’ll weave things together and make arguments that sound convincing, but all the while you know something’s wrong. Then it might hit you that they’re predicting the future.

Now, before I move on, I have to say that they might be right. All of their predictions about society and culture, the future of the church, and particularly the futures of evangelicalism and other conservative theological movements might come true. I’m just a little skeptical.

I don’t know what’s behind the speculation. I don’t know if it’s true belief, reasonable expectation, or just hope. I’m sure there’s a mixture of all three, and some I haven’t thought of. But what’s happening in the movement, just as in much of society, is that the speculation is taking the place of reality.

What just a few years ago was simply an idea of what might be the future of our culture is now said to be the reality of our culture. So many in the Emergent movement began adjusting their practice and theology to entice the members of this new society. Now, in an incredibly short span of time, the ideas and positions of just a few years ago are deeply entrenched ideologies.

Consider this post at Pomomusings.com (154 comments and counting) titled “The Bible & Homosexuality: Enough with the Bible Already.” Read more

Mark Driscoll and the Progressive Double Standard

Posted February 16, 2008 by Charles
7

e-s_038.jpgAs I thought a little bit more about the tendency I discussed in my last post, other instances of the progressive double standard came to mind.  The most glaring is all the flack Mark Driscoll has taken for pointing out bad theology, particularly at last year’s Convergent Conference (my thoughts here).

It seems that every time he steps out and tries to speak the truth about the poor theology of Emergent leaders, he gets chastised.  The sentiment seems to be along these lines: Who are you to say what is good and bad theology?  To many this sounds righteously indignant.  Unfortunately the people who say it are often doing the same thing themselves.

I keep mentioning McLaren’s new book, but it fits here, too. It seems to be nothing but a treatise on the invalidity of the “conventional” (read traditional or conservative) view of Jesus, and the truth of the “emerging” view.  He mocks traditional doctrines and sets them up with language that we can generously call “unfavorable”.  He is committing the same social crimes that Driscoll seems to be guilty of.  Pagitt is no different.

But Doug and Brian’s behavior will never be acknowledged as akin to Mark’s, because their follower’s believe them to be right, therefore they have the authority to correct and mock other theological positions.

Enough Already!

Posted November 27, 2006 by Charles
0

You’d think people would be sick of crying “Wolf!” by now. The world hasn’t ended yet, despite all your posturing and hoping and warning, and I don’t think it’s going to any time soon. Of course, I could be wrong, and if I am, that’s okay, but in the mean time, you’re making anyone who takes any word in the Bible literally look foolish.

Okay, sorry. That was just a little rant targeted at all those biblical prophecy nuts who are trying to convince the world that the apocalypse is coming. On my way to work today I heard a commercial on the radio about a seminar that will be held this Saturday, and it made me a little queasy. It bothers me for two reasons: First, the Bible says that no one knows the day or the hour that Christ will return. Which, to me, means that you can’t predict it. Which brings me to the second reason…why try? There’s no legitimate point in building this case about the prophecy, other than trying to become rich and feed your ego. You’ll only convince people who already believed it, and you begin to look foolish.

There is one defense of it, and that’s that Jesus taught about the end times, he told people to watch the “signs of the times”, and Revelation is in the Bible to be read and understood, just like the rest. But are we going to continue to start up the bandwagon every time someone takes a shot at Israel? That just doesn’t make sense, since they’ve been fighting with at least one of their neighbors every day for 60 years. Give it a rest!

We should be focusing our energy in places where it will make a difference: counseling, benevolence, service, teaching Biblical examples of the Christian life. We should be helping people interact with the lost, so that they can be found. We should be telling people that God loves them and wants healing for them and wants them to lead the holy, peaceful life he intended. Not shouting that they’ll die painfully, then go to Hell.

Power of Suggestion is proudly powered by WordPress.org and whiteboard

© Charles Jones 2006-2009 // pos51.org